Gun Fools Fire Another Shot

   Posted by: Interceder   in The Constitution

Sometimes we should be asking for the definitions of terms we choose to use, so in this case, according to merriam-webster.com/dictionary, “a fool is a person lacking in judgment or prudence.”

Watch this weapon to make sure it
does not get up and kill somebody!

Where are these gun fools going wrong? Their first reaction is to make more gun laws. There are way too many of them who really want to ban guns altogether, but that is to be another post. The foolish thing about this line of thinking is there are already more than enough gun laws and more laws won’t make a difference except in the move toward banning them. The real answer to situations like this maniac in San Diego is to provide more accountability. If the defense for this person is that he had a psychological problem, then someone knew about it before he decided to play his deadly game. Mom and roommates should have told police a long time ago. So then the argument would be the police could have done nothing. If so, then this is the problem that needs to be addressed, not gun laws. The maniac got his guns legally. Apparently, insanity is not a valid part of the back ground check. They could check him til Kingdom come, but who decides when someone is crazy. Do you want your doctor to report to the government that you are taking Valium or some other psychotropic drug?

Probably not, but it is coming. You think you want Congress to pass a law about that disclosure? The only people who would be exempt would be Congress where there is probably rampant use of those medicines, but we will never know that. (.We digress.) What took place is this man was enabled. There was no accountability. (The roommates did pay a price for their silence, didn’t they when he stabbed them to death?) (The mother of another of these maniacs paid that price for enabling her son when she was one of the first people to die.)  There was no reckoning (the time when your actions are judged as good or bad and you are rewarded or punished) when the warning signs began to appear. That “reckoning definition brings us to the other problem with the gun fools, there is no punishment. There is another definition for “fool” not in the dictionary, but in the bible. Psalm 14:1 says “The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, they do abominable deeds, there is none who does good.” Most of the government and especially the Supreme Court falls into this category of fool when they fire their shots at the Constitution. Despite the founding of this country on the principle (a moral rule or belief that helps you know what is right and wrong and that influences your actions) that there is a God, the Supreme Court is trying like hell to remove God from their activities.

John Adams in a speech to the military in 1798 warned his fellow countrymen stating, “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” John Adams is a signer of the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights and our second President. 

(I found several quotes relating to this FACT at http://www.free2pray.info/5founderquotes.html) Rather than coddling with a “life without parole” sentence, it is the government’s responsibility to EXECUTE a murderer. (Leviticus 24:17 “‘If a man takes the life of any human being, he shall surely be put to death.”) At this point the biblical “fools” will be screaming “bible thumper,” “religious fanatic,” but I challenge you to prove than man’s laws are better than God’s laws. For those who profess to show mercy, that is God’s role. By the way, when the government performs an execution, some fools call that “murder,” but, no, that is called “responsibility” (something that you should do because it is morally right, legally required, etc.). While we are on the idiocy of the Supreme Court, the expense of an execution is not caused by the completion of the responsibility, but by the 20 to 30 years of the appeals process. We no longer have a “justice” system, we have a “court” system. So while there are fools taking more shots toward gun control, when will America begin to think a lot more rationally and a lot less emotionally about the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution?

Amendment II A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This entry was posted on Friday, May 30th, 2014 at 9:36 am and is filed under The Constitution. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.